![]() The Photo Style is fixed on V-Log (the Photo Style doesn’t get applied to the RAW recording, but the display gamma on the camera will be shown as V-Log.ĪWB, AWBc, AWBw, Daylight, Cloudy, Shade, Incandescent, Flash are unavailable in the white balance settings Here is a list of things you need to know when outputting RAW over HDMI: * The codec is available via Blackmagic’s video assist for two camera models, the Panasonic EVA1 and Canon EOS C300 Mark II. However, if you come up with a reference that supports what you’re saying, I’d be delighted to see it. The idea is simply inconsistent with widespread views on the Blackmagic codec, such as the Newsshooter quote that I already provided you. It’s quite a leap to say that Blackmagic’s failure to license its codec to other manufacturers’ cameras shows that it is refusing to license it*.In the absence of a statement from Blackmagic to that effect, it looks to me like this falls into the wishful thinking category. If you go up a few posts, you’ll find links to Adorama and B&H videos about the release. ![]() This will be available on the 25th of May to download.” News Shooter.Īctually, the firmware update for the S1H was released out of beta yesterday. I do not have time to go back and dig up a statement made last year when BRaw was launched, you can do that if you like, search “BRaw on cameras” here if you like.Īlso, the Panasonic S1H is not currently recording ProResRaw, not until May 25 as the soonest when the FW upgrade is due to be released, “ The RAW upgrade comes in the form of a FREE firmware update (v2.0). One thing that I don’t understand is what criticisms of Philip Bloom and/or Z Cam have to do with the substantive issue in this thread.ĭenny Smith wrote:Rob, if BMD was licensing BRaw to another camera manufacturer you would know, it would be in the announcements section if nothing else. In saying that, I want to make it clear that I have nothing against Blackmagic’s codec, I’m just happy to use ProRes for what are, for me, practical reasons. In my own case, I am considering a move from a Pocket 4K to an S1H or Leica SL2, the move makes financial sense and one of the reasons is that I am happy with Apple’s codec and don’t care about Blackmagic’s. I think that many prospective purchasers of a BMPCC are likely to have the S1H on their short list unless they can’t afford one. Indeed, I think that it’s a mistake to think that the issue is just about recording in Raw. Blackmagic have said that they are very open to letting just about anyone use Blackmagic RAW as opposed to making it a closed system.”Īntoine wrote:Also, I don't see this as a direct competitor since it's not integrated into the camera, you need to buy and plug an external monitorĪs a practical matter, this point, which has also been made earlier in this thread, doesn’t fit very well with the constant refrain of BMPCC owners that one should purchase a monitor to rig the camera properlyĪlthough this thread started with a reference to the Z Cam E2, the issue is broader and includes, for example, Panasonic’s S1H, which Netflix has approved for its productions and which, as of yesterday, records ProRes Raw with an Atomos recorder. ![]() “I’m surprised that Blackmagic RAW hasn’t found its way into some other companies cameras. Indeed, there are many who are under the impression that Blackmagic’s public statements favour, indeed encourage, implementation by camera manufacturers, this quote from Newsshooter being an example: I guess that I assumed that “the spirit” is a well-understood term. I apologise if my comment about that gave you the impression that I don’t know the difference between an app and a sensor. It would help explain why use of Apple’s codec is expanding and use of Blackmagic’s isn’t.Īs I said, I do not think that that position is consistent with the spirit of the company’s previous statements about its codec. The reason I asked is that I have not seen this claim elsewhere, surprising because it would be big news in the camera world if Blackmagic was deliberately refusing to let camera manufacturers use its codec. ![]() Denny Smith wrote:BMD is not currently licensing BRaw to any third party camera manufacturers, as they are keeping tight control on its implementation.įrom your reply above, I gather that you don’t have a source. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |